1994: LeGare Case Leads to New Admissions Process for Selective Public Schools in Philadelphia

Each fall, eighth graders in Philadelphia public schools have a momentous decision to make: where to apply to high school. And each fall, a well-regarded process called LeGare supports students with disabilities who aspire to attend the city’s top schools. These learning needs include special education and English-language learning services.

Due to a consent decree won by Education Law Center three decades ago, students with individualized education programs or Section 504 accommodations plans, along with English learners, have expanded opportunities to win admission to the district’s array of selective high schools.

The case began when frustrated parents contacted ELC in the early 1990s after their children had missed out on serious consideration for admission to selective high schools of their choosing due to systemic inequities in the admissions process.

For our former client Lamar LeGare, a technical high school such as Bok or Dobbins might have been a good fit, but neither his aunt (as his guardian) nor his special-education team was consulted, and his application never even left his middle school.

Computers, math, and communications were favorite subjects for Michael Pearson-Lane, and he and his mother aimed for his admission to Carver, Franklin Learning Center, or Roxborough, which had a communications program that Michael liked. But Michael’s IEP team had dropped the ball, most likely because team members had little familiarity with the multi-step high school selection process.

The 1994 case, Lamar LeGare et al. v. School District of Philadelphia, resulted in a consent decree in 1995 establishing more equitable policies and procedures for students with disabilities seeking admission to Philadelphia’s specialized and magnet schools. Consent decrees are negotiated agreements enforced by the court. As a result of ELC’s advocacy, the agreement was extended to English learners a few years later.

Under the decree, the district is required to ensure that students with disabilities are not excluded from attending selective high schools if they can do so successfully when given reasonable accommodations.

To determine whether the student could succeed with accommodations, a review team from the home school evaluates each case. The team members are the principal, school counselor, and special education teacher, ESOL teacher (for English learners), or school nurse (for students with 504 plans). Rejected students also have the right to an impartial review of that decision.

The enduring legacy of the LeGare consent decree in the district’s current school selection process cannot be overstated, according to ELC senior attorney Margie Wakelin.

For example, after an analysis of the revamped school selection process in 2023, the district extended the Individualized Review (formerly known as the LeGare process) to all students applying for special-admission middle schools to ensure that discrimination does not occur during those pivotal years.

Wakelin noted that the district’s commitment to the core policies underlying the LeGare consent decree remains intact, “ensuring that more students with disabilities and English learners have access to these excellent schools.”

Still, she said, the district should continue its efforts to identify barriers that shut students out of these schools.

According to Wakelin, advocates including ELC have urged the district to conduct a meaningful analysis of current school selection data to address any “lasting barriers that impermissibly deny access to schools solely based on disability, language, or national origin.”

1992: State Ordered to Eliminate Gaps in Services for Students With Disabilities

In the early 1990s, Education Law Center-PA attorneys challenged Pennsylvania’s inadequate system for educating children with complex disabilities. The class action case upended past practices and ensured access to a continuum of educational placements and services, with direct state involvement when needed, for such students.

The case, Cordero et al. v. Pennsylvania Department of Education, was filed in U.S. District Court as a class action.

Affidavits, including one from Irish Bates, mother of Brian Cordero, gave accounts of children relegated to homebound instruction or inappropriate classes for long periods of time, even a year, while waiting for appropriate placements.

At the time, the burden fell to local districts to find placements for children whose needs could not be addressed in local public schools. But spaces in state-approved private schools were limited – or nonexistent – in less populated areas of the state. Families faced months of delay while their local districts attempted to find suitable placement.

In Pennsylvania local districts are deemed to be the front-line providers. Individual districts provide special education services, adhering to federal law and a set of state statutes and regulations promulgated by the legislature and the state Board of Education.

In Cordero, the state argued that any delays and violations of the federal law – IDEA, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act – was the fault of the districts, not the state.

The lawsuit alleged that this system cast students with disabilities into “education limbo for an extended period,” sometimes receiving only a few hours of instruction per week.

ELC attorneys argued the state failed to meet its obligation to offer a range of education services with varied placement settings, and Judge Sylvia Rambo agreed.

The case established that the state has an unequivocal responsibility to ensure prompt access to a range of placements for children who may need a more complex set of special education supports – and ensure access to a free appropriate education in the least restrictive environment.

In a follow-up 1993 ruling, Judge Rambo ordered the state to track students who cannot find placement, determine areas of the state that lack services, increase availability of appropriate local programs, and ensure coordination between state agencies to improve services. She emphasized that regardless of a local school district’s actions, it is “the state’s obligation to ensure that the systems it put in place are running properly and that if they are not, to correct them.”

After the Cordero decision, ELC attorneys worked with the state agencies for several years on implementing it, helping establish protocols and procedures that are still in effect today.

In the end, the state Department of Education “acknowledged its responsibility to arrange programs and placements for kids whose districts were unable or had failed to do so, through a process called intensive interagency coordination,” recalled Len Rieser, former ELC executive director and one of the attorneys who litigated the case.

The Cordero ruling, he said, came as “a relief to parents – and for that matter districts – that had struggled to find options for kids with complex disabilities.”

In population centers such as Philadelphia and Pittsburgh, approved private schools – those that meet criteria to receive state funding – often educate students with more serious or particular needs. Still, said Rieser, “the emphasis of the interagency process was on keeping kids in inclusive settings, including local schools, whenever possible.”

State Directs School District of Philadelphia to Award Compensatory Education, Revise Procedures for Students with Disabilities at PJJSC

In response to ELC’s systemic complaint filed in March on behalf of students with disabilities at the Philadelphia Juvenile Justice Services Center (PJJSC), the Pennsylvania Department of Education’s Bureau of Special Education recently issued a decision, finding in our favor on all seven issues raised. The ruling requires the School District of Philadelphia to determine compensatory education service awards for over 200 students and to significantly revise its process and procedures for serving students with disabilities placed at the PJJSC.

Our complaint was based on information received from partners and families that students with disabilities at PJJSC failed to receive needed services and inconsistent or intermittent access to instruction or were deprived of classroom instruction due in part to conditions of overcrowding.

The Corrective Investigation Report issued by the Department found in part that students with disabilities failed to receive special education services mandated by their IEPs, progress reports, timely re-evaluations, and that youth placed in admissions or quarantine failed to receive access to classroom instruction at all. The state ordered significant compensatory education services for individually named students and directed the District to determine compensatory education awards for over two hundred students placed at the PJJSC by October 25, 2024.  As a result of our complaint and the ensuing decision, the District must also revise its procedures for: transitioning students to the PJJSC; implementing IEPs; ensuring parent participation and conducting evaluations to assess eligibility for special education services.   

Read ELC’s New Special Education Funding Report

The Education Law Center’s new report Fixing the Special Education Funding Gap details the large decline in the state share of special education funding over the past decade. Inadequate funding for basic education and special education programs creates a dual funding gap, one that particularly affects students in low wealth school districts. These districts serve most of Pennsylvania’s Black and Brown students who are disproportionately impacted by the state’s underfunding of public education.  

Read the report here

Find data for each of Pennsylvania’s 500 school districts here

Read the press release here.  

View a recording of the press conference here

ELC Files Complaint Against Charter School, Challenging Refusal to Admit Child with Disability

ELC filed a complaint in Pennsylvania’s Common Pleas Court on October 17, 2019, on behalf of a first-grade student who was illegally denied enrollment in a public charter school on the basis of her disability. ELC contends that this action by Mathematics, Civics and Sciences Charter School (MCSCS) of Philadelphia violates the child’s rights under state law.

“This is a glaring example of explicit and illegal discrimination,” said Margie Wakelin, staff attorney at the Education Law Center. “Unfortunately, it is not an isolated case. Charter schools, just like district schools, need to serve students with disabilities and cannot turn them away.”

ELC filed a petition for a preliminary injunction along with the complaint, seeking a court order directing MCSCS to enroll the student immediately. MCSCS enrolls a tiny percentage of students with disabilities, far below the average percentage of students with IEPs for all charter schools in Philadelphia.

Read our news release here. Read the complaint here.

Read media coverage here, here, and here.

Open Letter to PA Special Education Funding Commission from PA Schools Work Campaign

The Special Education Funding Commission of the Pennsylvania legislature reconvened August 27, 2019, for the first time in nearly six years to examine the impact of the 2014 funding formula that now directs state special education funding. Education Law Center joined with the statewide PA Schools Work campaign to issue an open letter with a set of recommendations to the commission for addressing the continued state underfunding of education.

Over the past decade, the state’s contribution to special education costs has dropped from a one-third share to just 22%. The letter urges a “fuller and fairer allocation of funding for special education.” The commission will be meeting and holding hearings over a three-month period.

Read the letter.

ELC Calls on Gov. Wolf to Propose Major Increase in Special Ed Funding

Following on our October report, “Shortchanging Children with Disabilities: State Underfunding of Special Education in Pennsylvania,” the Education Law Center wrote Gov. Tom Wolf in January, urging that his 2019-20 budget proposal include a $400 million increase in state funding for basic education and a $100 million increase in special education funding, to be distributed to districts through the existing funding formulas. Read our letter, press release, and news coverage.

Child Advocates Seek More Special Ed Funding

The Sanatoga Post writes about the two dozen advocacy organizations that worked together to pressure Pennsylvania lawmakers to increase the money available for special education purposes. The article quotes ELC Attorney Reynelle Brown Staley. Read here.

PDE Widens Investigation and Remedy For Young Children With Disabilities Transitioning to Kindergarten in Philadelphia

The Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) has significantly broadened its corrective action in response to ELC’s administrative complaint alleging that the School District of Philadelphia denied young children with disabilities timely evaluations and special education services upon transitioning to Kindergarten or First Grade.  In its prior Complaint Investigation Report (“CIR”) PDE required the District to determine whether it denied any child’s right to receive mandated services during this critical transition, and if so, to issue compensatory education to make up for lost services.  At ELC’s urging through a Request for Reconsideration, PDE agreed to verify the accuracy of the District’s determination that 170 children had been denied services with a random file review.  Recently completed, that review disclosed that the District failed to identify a significant number of students who were denied special education services.  In response, PDE has now expanded its investigation to include an additional 1,795 students with disabilities who transitioned to school last fall to ensure that all children receive needed make-up services.  ELC will continue to press PDE to ensure every child receives relief.  The District is also required to obtain PDE approval for a new procedure to prevent recurring violations this upcoming fall.  You can read the complaints filed by Independence Foundation Law Fellow Sean McGrath and PDE’s Investigation Reports here.

ELC Applauds Gov. Wolf’s Education Budget Proposals, but PA Still Has Far to Go.

Education Law Center Executive Director Deborah Gordon Klehr applauded Gov. Tom Wolf’s proposed increases in funding for basic education, special education, early education, and career and technical education in his Feb. 6 budget address. But the state still has far to go, she said in a press statement, to achieve an adequate and equitable funding system. Read the statement here.

24 Pennsylvania Organizations Join Together to Oppose ESA Voucher Senate Bill

On January 19, 2018, ELC joined 23 other organizations, including teachers, other school workers, school administrators, school boards, advocates, faith-based organizations, and non-partisan civic organizations such as the League of Women Voters, to oppose PA Senate Bill 2.  The Bill is a school voucher proposal masquerading as an Education Savings Account program.  The Bill is a direct attack on public education itself, because it would divert tax dollars to private and religious schools that have no accountability to the public and no obligation to provide (for example) special education, other services to children with disabilities, or services to English Language Learners.  Read the letter here and please call your PA Senator to help protect public education in Pennsylvania by urging him or her to oppose this regressive proposal.

Pa. Department of Education finds Philadelphia School District Violated Rights of at least 800 Children Starting Kindergarten

The Education Law Center has successfully filed a complaint against the School District of Philadelphia on behalf of hundreds of students with disabilities who were not provided with needed services after entering kindergarten or first-grade. The Pennsylvania Department of Education has issued corrective action in response to the complaint, requiring the School District of Philadelphia to issue compensatory education services for all children who were denied a free, appropriate, public education due to the District’s delay and inaction. The Education Law Center applauded the Department’s findings and intervention but also requested further corrective action.  Here are links to read the Complaint and the Department’s Complaint Investigation Report.

ELC files PDE complaint to remedy deficiencies in transition of students from Early Intervention to Philadelphia elementary schools

ELC filed an administrative complaint with the PA Department of Education (“PDE”) on behalf of three individual children and all others similarly situated who have been deprived of smooth transitions to kindergarten or first grade in the School District of Philadelphia (“District”).  State and federal law mandates that children with disabilities must move from early intervention services to elementary school without disruption of the critical special education services to which they are legally entitled.  However, the District has failed to meet these requirements and ELC has asked PDE’s Bureau of Special Education to investigate and issue corrective action as necessary. Specifically, the District is required to (1) complete a re-evaluation of a child’s eligibility for services within 60 days of receiving signed parental consent, (2) provide a Re-evaluation Report to the parent at least 10 days prior to an IEP meeting, and (3) ensure that an IEP is completed within the 30 days of the IEP meeting. Additionally, federal law requires that children who have limited English proficiency are evaluated in their native language to ensure an accurate re-evaluation. If you or any families you know have had similar issues transitioning from early intervention to the District, please contact Sean McGrath at [email protected].  You can read a copy of ELC’s Complaint here.

 

 

City’s public schools, education beneficiaries of new state budget

by Stacy M. Brown, Philadelphia Tribune, Jul 8, 2017

After state lawmakers overwhelmingly passed a $32 billion budget that still has no defined plan in which to pay for it, many around the commonwealth have hailed the spending plan as a victory for public schools and for early childhood and special education.

Local lawmakers added that it’s a victory for Philadelphia area schools as well.

Continue reading

School Reform Commission approves new in-house special education program: The District downscaled the proposal after advocates complained, but concerns linger.

July 6, 2017 — Philadelphia Public School Notebook — by Dale Mezzacappa and Avi Wolfman-Arent

The School Reform Commission voted Thursday to establish a new in-house special education program for 100 students, most diagnosed with social-emotional disabilities and now placed in facilities run by Wordsworth. The new program will be run initially by the private education provider Catapult Learning before transitioning to full District control.